My eight-step process
DP Geography · Internal assessment · The River Asse

Eight steps to your Geography IA

Everyone has the same fieldwork question and collects the data together, in one day. Nineteen of the 25 marks are earned afterwards, by you alone.

Your fieldwork question

How do the fluvial characteristics of a river change with distance from the source?

Step 1 unpacks what it commits you to.

Start step 1 or see all eight steps below
25%
of your grade at SL, 20% at HL
25
marks, across six criteria
2,500
word limit. Graphs, maps and data tables don't count
1 draft
your teacher can comment on. The next one is final
Your deadlines
First draft
Thursday, 24 September 2026 at 12:00
Paper copy with maps and graphs, plus a PDF to ManageBac. No feedback on work that misses this.
Final submission
Thursday, 12 November 2026 at 12:00
One PDF to ManageBac. It does not come back for tweaking.
What you are working on now

Summer: your methodology, and your graphs and maps

Two things to bring back. A methodology of no more than 300 words, covering only the methods behind the data you are actually using — annotated photographs are the cheapest way to save words. And a set of data presentation methods showing at least five different skills, one of which must be a well-produced locational map.

The process

Each step produces something the next one needs. Grey bands name the report section each step builds; word counts are for writing that section up.

The IB sets only the 2,500-word total. These section counts are our advice and leave 50 words spare.

“If we all have the same question, what makes it mine?”

The shared part is worth six marks; the individual part, nineteen. Spend your time accordingly.

Shared: the question and the data

One question, one day at the river, one set of readings. The IB allows data to be collected and shared as a group.

Yours: what you do with it

Which variables and sites you use, how you present them, what you explain and conclude, and how honestly you evaluate it. Criteria C to F: nineteen of the 25 marks.

Yours alone: the writing

IB rule: after the fieldwork, the writing, the justification of methods, the analysis and the conclusion must be entirely your own.

The river you are investigating

The Asse: 13.5 km, engineered and now being restored

The Asse rises on the Dôle massif at the foot of the Jura and runs about 13.5 km into Lake Geneva at Nyon. Our nine sites fall from 711 m to 413 m over just under 9 km of channel, all measured in one day under the same flow conditions.

Reaches were straightened and confined long ago. Since about 2019 a flood-protection and renaturation scheme has covered about 4.5 km inside Nyon, and the Calèves, a tributary diverted when the motorway was built, has been reconnected to the Asse.

Where a channel has been rebuilt, its width, depth and gradient are partly a human decision, not just a product of distance from the source. So a site can break your trend, and explaining why is what the top band of Criterion D (Written analysis) asks for.

The fieldwork sites
SiteWhereAltitudeFrom source
1Near source711 m0.35 km
2Corner of field540 m2.67 km
3Other end of field540 m3.08 km
4Next to road515 m4.32 km
5Near Paleo458 m6.08 km
6Behind Paleo454 m6.12 km
7Lunch441 m7.92 km
8Near the flats413 m9.07 km
9Near the flats413 m9.28 km

298 m of fall over 8.9 km, a mean gradient of 3.3%. The spacing is uneven: 2.3 km between the first two sites, 40 m between sites 5 and 6. The list can change each year, so check it against the sheet you are given on the day.

The nine sites, source at the top left. Click a marker for its details; click the map, then scroll to zoom. The dashed line joins the sites in order, not the river's true course. Map © OpenStreetMap contributors.

Where reports lose marks

Six common mistakes, each covered in full on its step.

Site number on the x-axis · step 5
The commonest error here. Your sites are unevenly spaced (2.3 km between the first two, 40 m between sites 5 and 6), so a site-number axis distorts the change the question asks about.
Describing eight variables instead of explaining three · step 4
Criterion C (Quality and treatment of information collected) rewards data that is all directly relevant. Variables no hypothesis needs cost marks in Criterion C and Criterion D (Written analysis), and words.
Deleting the site that does not fit · step 6
The top band of Criterion D (Written analysis) asks for anomalies explained; the band below only lists them. On a river with engineered and restored reaches, an odd site is usually explicable and worth more than a clean trend.
"Human error, the weather, more sites" · step 7
Points you could have written before the fieldwork day: "superficial", the bottom band of Criterion F (Evaluation).
A tour of the graphs · step 6
A paragraph per site saying what its figure shows is the middle band: change along a river cannot be shown one site at a time.
An unedited screenshot as the locational map · step 2
Criterion A (Fieldwork question and geographic context) names "a copy of an existing map" in its middle band. Your own sites, labels and design lift it.

How to use this guide

Work through the steps in order and tick each checklist honestly: an unticked box is your next job. Signed in, your ticks are saved and your teacher sees your progress, never your writing.

One thing before you start

Your teacher gives written feedback on one full draft: what is strong and what is weak, but no corrections. Your next version is final.

So hand in something complete, not polished: feedback on four of six sections covers only four. Write in a Google Doc shared with your teacher from the start; its version history is the best evidence that the writing is yours.

Step 1 · The investigation you have been given

Turn the shared question into hypotheses you can test.

Start step 1

Anything marked “our river” is specific to our fieldwork on the River Asse at Nyon. Photographs are the author’s own.